caslon analytics elephant logoahrooogah!!title for media groups profile

home | about | site use | services | guides | briefings  


overview

ABC, SBS, BBC

Advance

Annenberg

AOL

APN

Astors

Aust industry

Aust Networks

Beaverbrook

Bertelsmann

Black

Cox

Disney

DMG

Elsevier

Fairfax

Financial Press

Fleet Street

Hearst

Liberty

Maxwell

News & Murdoch

New Yorker

NY Times

Packer

Sony

Thomson

Time Warner

Tribune

US Networks

Viacom

Vivendi

W Post



section heading icon
     overview


This profile is under development.

It provides snapshots of major media groups, and a few of the more notorious individuals, particularly those with a substantial Australian presence.

Most pages point to major biographical or corporate studies. And they provide an inventory - necessarily not exact, given the volatility within the industry as companies merge and pieces are acquired or sold - that offers a sense of media tentacles.

A picture of the media industries in the age of the internet is provided in the economy guide.

The separate print profile includes information about book publishers.

subsection heading icon    in the age of the internet 

Enthusiasts such as George Gilder - notably in his Telecosm: How Infinite Bandwidth Will Revolutionise Our World (New York, Free Press 00) and Life After Television (New York, Norton 92) - argue that the digital environment is qualitatively different. All the rules have changed, existing models are dangerous or irrelevant and 'old media' is likely to become just another roadkill on the information highway.

We disagree with that hyperbole.

It's clear that there's great uncertainty in the canyons of Manhattan (and other climes inhabited by media czars). And there's much noise from soothsayers that the end is nigh. However, 'old media' has proved characteristically resilient. Today the prophets warn that Napster means the end of old media and life as we know it. Forty years ago it was television. Eighty years ago radio and recorded music would mean the death of culture. 

There's thus some value in looking at the past: new technologies have generally supplemented rather than destroyed existing communication mechanisms, 'content' companies have assimilated new delivery mechanisms, markets consume content rather than bandwidth. 

subsection heading icon    some characteristics 

Old media is still profitable and has the revenue to acquire complementary or competing new media interests. Despite gloomy prognostications regional newspaper and radio interests continue to deliver above-average returns, in contrast to the black hole with the name 'new media'.

Media groups are getting larger. 'Critical mass' is important - in the eyes of executives and fund managers - and many seem to have adopted Roy Thomson's model: "I buy newspapers to make money to buy more newspapers to make more money." And if czars can afford bigger toys they'll buy them.  

In response to uncertainty - whether it's the search for the 'killer app' or merely the perceived need to pre-empt competitors - most of the groups are heading in two directions. 

Some are hedging their bets by 'bundling' film, print, recorded music, broadcasting and online services. Some throw in a theme park chain as well. Integration is a challenge few have mastered. Others - such as Elsevier, Thomson and Kluwer - are specialising, shedding non-core holdings to fund growth as specialist publishers online and offline. Most are seeking a global presence and thus operate in Australia. 

The groups continue to 'churn' their holdings, with ongoing restructuring of the empires and newspapers, magazines, film studios and other properties being actively traded. We've provided a schematic of what group operates in which area.

Anthony Smith's The Age of Behemoths: The Globalisation of Mass Media Firms (New York, 20th Century Fund 91), Richard Gershon's The Transnational Media Corporation: Global Messages & Free Market Competition (Mahwah, Erlbaum 97) and The International Market in Film & Television Programs (Norwood, Ablex 93) edited by Eli Noam & Joel Millonzi are suggestive.

Michael Wolf's The Entertainment Economy (New York, Times 99) is less convincing than Harold Vogel's Entertainment Industry Economics (Cambridge, Cambridge Uni Press 98). For a guts & glory view consult Bruce Wasserstein's Big Deal (New York, Warner 98).