|
US
This page considers pretexting in the USA.
In
the US federal law prohibits pretexting for financial
information, but it does not specifically ban the practice
in relation to phone records or forbid online sale of
phone records. Carriers are required by the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 to protect Customer Proprietary Network Information
(CPNI) and have accordingly claimed on occasion that they
are victimised by pretexters.
EPIC commented that
Banning
the commercial sale of private consumer information
is a necessary complement to banning pretexting, as
it would "dry up the market" for illegally
obtained telephone records. Such a prohibition would
also allow consumers and consumer protection agencies
to go after those who advertise privacy-invasive services
without having to prove the specific techniques that
the data brokers have used
Section
6821
of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (15 USC) makes
it a crime to commit pretexting against a financial institution,
broadly defined under the Act, but does not provide for
private action: enforcement is a federal responsibility.
The FTC has initiated a handful of enforcement actions
under that Act, notably against a Canadian company, generally
resulting in administrative penalties. Critics have accordingly
argued that federal legislation must specify that pretexting
to obtain mobile phone records - or other records where
there is no financial loss - is just as serious as pretexting
for financial data.
Supporters of the existing US regime note that breaking
into online accounts violates the Computer Fraud &
Abuse Act (18 USC 1030), although a caution is supplied
in Jennifer Granick's 2006 article
Faking It: Calculating Loss in Computer Crime Sentencing.
It has been argued that pretexting that deceives network
operators to provide 'private' information violates the
Wire Fraud Act (18 USC 1343).
There have however been no definitive cases regarding
pretexting in relation to those enactments or the FTC's
broader power to prevent "unfair, deceptive or fraudulent
business activities", including anti-phishing cases
highlighted here.
next page (Australia)
|