|
studies
This page looks at studies of Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) schemes, legislation and issues.
It covers -
- primers
- Australia
- international
- online
Australia
An introduction to the Australian regimes is provided
by Hilary Astor & Christine Chinkin's Dispute
Resolution in Australia (Sydney: LexisNexis Butterworths
2002), Tania Sourdin's Alternative Dispute Resolution
(Sydney: Law Book 2002) and Archie Zariski's 2000 paper
Disputing Culture: Lawyers and ADR. They are
complemented by Alternative Dispute Resolution &
the Courts (Leichhardt: Federation Press 2004) edited
by Tania Sourdin.
The 1998 Australian Law Reform Commission paper
Review of the adversarial system of litigation: ADR
- its role in federal dispute resolution remains
of importance.
international
Among literature on global ADR we recommend Dealing
in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration &
the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order by
Yves Dezalay & Bryant Garth (Chicago: Uni of Chicago
Press 1998), International Commercial Arbitration in
the United States: Commentary & Materials (New York:
Kluwer 1994) by Gary Born and Law & Practice of International
Commercial Arbitration (London: Sweet & Maxwell 1999)
by Alan Redfern & Martin Hunter.
For UNCITRAL see A Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law
On Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary
(London: Kluwer 1989) by Howard Holtzmann & Joseph
Neuhaus, The New York Convention of 1958 (Deventer:
Kluwer 1981) by Albert van den Berg and International
Commercial Arbitration: A Transnational Perspective
(St Paul: West 1999) by Tibor Várady, John Barceló &
Arthur von Meheren.
For US perspectives see Jack Coe's International Commercial
Arbitration: American Principles and Practice in a Global
Context (Irvington-on-Hudson: Transnational 1997)
and papers in International Dispute Resolution: The
Regulation of Forum Selection (Irvington-on-Hudson:
Transnational 1997) edited by Jack Goldsmith.
online
For online issues see in particular Ethan Katsh's Online
Dispute Resolution (New York: Jossey-Bass 2001), Rufus
Pichler's 2000 thesis Trust and Reliance-Enforcement
and Compliance: Enhancing Consumer Confidence in the Electronic
Marketplace (PDF)
and Julia Hörnle's 2002 JILT paper
Online Dispute Resolution in Business to Consumer E-commerce
Transactions.
The major study of what might be involved in taking the
arbitration out of the offices of corporate lawyers and
onto screens for access by individual consumers, small
businesses and other parties is the
project under the auspices of the American Bar Association
(ABA).
In mid-2001 it released a short preliminary report and
concept paper (PDF)
on "consensus-based protocols, workable guidelines
and standards that can be implemented by parties to on-line
transactions and by online dispute resolution providers"
in multi-jurisdictional B2B and B2C transactions.
The report reflects ongoing debate about the proposed
Hague Convention on Jurisdiction & Foreign Judgements
in Civil & Commercial Matters (HCCH), a
contentious international agreement applying to most private
litigation. It has been the target of severe criticism
by commercial interests and by other advocacy groups;
examples are the attack
by the US Consumer Project on Technology (CPT)
and the Harm from the Hague
paper from open source guru Richard Stallman. There's
a succinct introduction in a Commonwealth Attorney-General's
discussion paper.
In Europe the ambitious E-Arbitration-T project,
criticised as another way of flushing EC funds into Spain's
software industry, is seeking to build ADR systems for
disputes between small and medium-sized enterprises. The
systems would provide "electronic support" for
the appointment of arbitrators, statements of claim and
of defence (with any amendments), pleas about the arbitrator's
jurisdiction, evidence and hearings, internal processes
and awards by the arbitrator.
surveys and primers
Disputes in Cyberspace: Online dispute resolution
for consumers in cross-border disputes - an international
survey report
- Consumers International
Out-of-Court Settlement of Disputes Concerning E-Commerce
Consumer Transactions: An Inventory of Current Approaches
2000 (txt)
- International Chamber of Commerce
Online Alternative Dispute Resolution: An Issues Primer
- University of Washington School of Law
academic
studies and conference papers
Christopher
Kuner's 2000 paper
on Legal Obstacles to ADR in European Business-to-Consumer
Electronic Commerce
Philippa Lawson's 2000 paper
on Online ADR Services for Cross-border B2C Disputes
Henry Perritt's 1999 paper
Dispute resolution in Cyberspace: Demand for new
forms of ADR
Ethan
Katsh, Janet Rifkin & Alan Gaitenby's 2000 paper
on E-commerce, E-disputes, and E-Dispute Resolution:
In the Shadow of 'eBay Law'
Dan DeStephen & John Helie's paper
Online Dispute Resolution: Implications for the ADR
Profession
Nora
Femenia's paper
ODR and the Global Management of Customers' Complaints:
How could ODR Techniques Be Responsive to Different
Social and Cultural Environments?
Esther van den Heuvel's 2000 paper (PDF)
Online Dispute Resolution as a Solution to Cross-Border
E-Disputes: An Introduction to ODR
Casey Lide's paper ADR & Cyberspace: The
Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Online Commerce,
Intellectual Property and Defamation - (abstract)
::
|