overview
background
Australian law
overseas law
agencies
advocacy
tools
texts
patents
names & links
ECMS
fair use
Indigenous
North-South
online music
plagiarism
moral rights
duration
email & news |
indigenous culture
Western copyright law is ill-equipped to address the needs (and
expectations) of
indigenous communities in Australia and overseas, given its emphasis on
limited duration, fixation and the action of individual authors rather
than collectives.
As one would expect, it's particularly contentious and
debate about particular reforms often embraces wider claims, such as
bio-rights, that rightly or wrongly are highly unlikely to get off the
ground.
international
Among recent international activity a
useful starting point is the new WIPO website
on traditional knowledge.
The site reflects the 1998
and 1999
WIPO
Roundtables on Intellectual Property & Traditional Knowledge and
includes the draft report
of the WIPO Fact Finding Mission on Traditional Knowledge,
Innovations & Culture.
It also has pointers to major documents
such as the
1991
United Nations Draft Declaration of the Rights of
the World's Indigenous Peoples
1993 UN report on the Study of the Protection
of the Cultural & Intellectual Property of Indigenous
Peoples and 1995 Final Report on the Protection
of the Heritage of Indigenous People
1982 UNESCO-WIPO Model Provisions for National
Laws on the Protection of Expressions of Folklore Against
Illicit Exploitation and Other Prejudicial Actions
1976 Tunis Model Law on Copyright for Developing
Countries
Perspectives on that activity are
provided by Michael Blakeney's 1998 paper
on Access
to Biological Resources: Domestic & International Developments &
Issues, Catherine Berryman's 1991 article
Toward More Universal Protection of Intangible Cultural
Property and Peter Githaiga's paper
on Intellectual
Property Law & the Protection of Indigenous Folklore & Knowledge. James
Boyle's Shamans, Software
& Spleen: Law & the Construction of the
Information Society (Cambridge, Harvard Uni Press 96)
is an important study that critiques Western notions of authorship.
The international Indigenous Peoples Council on Biopiracy (IPCB)
includes pointers to some thinking about bio-rights.
Valuing
Local Knowledge: Indigenous People & Intellectual
Property Rights (Washington, Island Press 96) is a
thoughtful although somewhat idealistic set of 1993
conference papers
edited by Stephen Brush & Doreen Stabinsky. Rosemary
Coombe's The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties:
Authorship, Appropriation & the Law (Durham, Duke
Uni Press 98) has more bite. Elazar Barkan's The Guilt
of Nations: Restitution & Negotiating Historical
Injustices (New York, Norton 00) offers a perspective
on international 'reparation' negotiations.
Thomas Greaves edited Intellectual Property Rights for
Indigenous Peoples: A Sourcebook (Oklahoma City,
Society for Applied Anthropology 94), an uneven but
valuable collection.
EU banker and politician Jacques Attali's Noise: The
Political Economy of Music (Minneapolis, Uni of
Minnesota Press 85) is too hermetic for our tastes.
There's a more accessible coverage of indigenous music
issues in Franco Fabbri's succinct 'Copyright: The Dark
Side of the Music Business' in Music & Copyright
(Edinburgh, Edinburgh Uni Press 93) edited by Steven
Frith.
Anthony McCann's 1998 paper
7th Irish Traditional Music & Copyright: an Issue
of Common Property? offers another perspective
local developments
Within Australia the agenda to a large
extent is currently being set by Our Culture, Our Future,
a wide-ranging and contentious report by Terri Janke on Indigenous
intellectual property issues for the Aboriginal & Torres Strait
Islander Commission (ATSIC).
It
was launched in
Sydney in September last year; a Government response is likely to
reflect the more restricted Stopping The Rip-offs discussion paper from
the federal Attorney-General's Department and Department of
Communications, Information Technology & the Arts.
On 4 December 2000 the long-awaited Copyright Amendment
(Moral Rights) Bill was passed by Parliament. Amendments
proposed by Senator Aden Ridgeway for the protection of
indigenous cultural expression were unsuccessful.
However, in what sometimes seems like an interminable
process of review the government indicated that it will "consult with appropriate indigenous peak
bodies as part of this process, and announce as soon as
practicable a package of measures to protect indigenous
arts and cultural expressions."
The Aboriginal
& Torres Strait Islander Library and Information Resources Network (ATSILIRN)
has developed eleven Indigenous intellectual
property protocols to "guide libraries, archives an
information services in appropriate ways to interact with Aboriginal and
Torres Strait Islander peoples ... and to handle materials with
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander content".
Among advocacy
organisations the National Indigenous Arts Advocacy Association (NIAA)
is prominent.
next page
(North-South)
|