Caslon Analytics elephant logo link to home page

home | about | site use | services | guides | profiles | papers | timeline || Analysphere | Ketupa | Cinetext


overview

studies

precursors

the Card

opposition

futures

landmarks







related pages icon
related
Guides:


Privacy

Security

Consumers

Networks




related pages icon
related
Profiles:


Forgery &
Forensics


Identity
Theft


section heading icon     precursors


This page considers national identification schemes in Australia prior to the 1980s.

It covers -

section marker icon     introduction

Government identification of citizens – and others – for financial, security or other purposes did not arise with the Australia Card. The Card was, in fact, an iteration of past identity cards and its significance for Australia is arguably because it embodied the first ubiquitous national multi-purpose identifier under government auspices in the digital era.

Earlier registration and identification schemes – several of which are still in daily use (and are integral to the operation of government agencies and private sector entities) – had been adopted in a period when community perceptions of privacy were different. Driver licences – the de facto identity document used by most Australian adults – appear unremarkable, indeed invisible, because they have "always been there". Unlike the Australia Card identification schemes such as passports and driver licensing lack the 'shock of the new', the novelty that leads some people to ask questions about principles and applications and provides others with a focus for ambient anxieties about change or authority.

Those schemes were more restricted than the Australia Card, because they

  • were ostensibly of limited duration (eg mandatory registration of non-British subjects for the duration of a war)
  • often had a restricted geographical coverage (eg embodied over 500 local registers)
  • had a sectoral rather than general coverage (eg drivers within a particular state/territory rather than all Australian adults)
  • did not feature a unique identifier that enables rapid integration of information from disparate databases
  • originated as manual systems (in some instances centred on handwritten bound registers) rather than being 'born digital'

Although information from some pre-1980s databases may have been distributed widely, the file number or other metadata used to control that information was not used outside the particular agency: it wasn't a ubiquitous identifier.

section marker icon     RBDM regimes

The official registration of births, deaths, marriages, divorces and adoptions provides foundation documents for the establishment of identity in contemporary advanced economies.

Comprehensive civil registration (first complementing and subsequently superseding the registration by religious organisations of births, baptisms, marriages and deaths - aka RBDM) is comparatively recent. It for example commenced in England in 1837 and Australia in 1838, reflecting changing perceptions of the responsibility of the state, secularisation, growth in the capacity of government agencies and the 19th century enthusiasm for social statistics discussed elsewhere on this site.

Commencement dates for civil registration in Australia and New Zealand are as follows

1838 Tasmania
1841 Western Australia
1842 South Australia
1848 New Zealand
1853 Victoria
1856 NSW
1856 Queensland
1870 Northern Territory (by NSW from 1856)
1930 Australian Capital Territory (by NSW to 1930)

Consistent with the technology available at that time, the registers were initially handwritten. More recent information is now held online (with the Australian Passports Office and other agencies having access for online validation); most jurisdictions provide public access to historic registers through microfilm or microfiche.

In Australia civil registration was a colonial (later state) responsibility. The various registers now operate under state/territory legislation rather than federal law and there is no single federal register of births, deaths, marriages and adoptions. Access to some information, notably regarding adoptions, and regimes for recognition of gender reassignment thus vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Registration does not provide a unique identification number.

section marker icon     citizens, aliens and others

Government in Australia and New Zealand, as in other jurisdictions, have differentiated between citizens and others. That differentiation has involved the provision of services and recognition of entitlements (including participation in the franchise). It has also involved restrictions on employment, residence and travel for 'aliens' - nationals of other countries or those whose allegiance was perceived as problematical - with a consequent registration so that those aliens can be identified and monitored.

At the time of Federation 'British subject' was the sole civic status identified in the Australian Constitution, given disagreement about the nature of Australian and imperial citizenship. The term 'Australian nationality' was not given official recognition until the 1969 Citizenship Act, with Australian citizens officially ceasing to be British subjects as late as 1984. (An administrative concept of citizenship was formalised in the Nationality & Citizenship Act 1948, which differentiated between British subjects who were permanent residents of Australia and those who were merely visitors, authorised or otherwise. Indigenous Australians were recognised as citizens rather than subjects in 1962.)

The legislation does not provide for a single national register of all Australian citizens or for a unique national identifier such as the US Social Security Number. Registration has instead been sectoral.

The 1916 War Precautions (Alien Registration) Regulations extended the War Precautions Act 1914 by establishing compulsory registration of aliens, who were required to register with state police or federal customs officials. The Regulations were in effect until replaced by the Aliens Registration Act 1920 (suspended in 1926 and repealed in 1934). They provided for restrictions on freedom of movement within the Commonwealth (and on residence in some locations), prohibitions on possession of firearms, internment and deportation of enemy aliens. Registers were maintained locally: lack of bureaucratic resources and technology meant that statistical abstracts were held centrally but there was no single integrated comprehensive database.

Interagency rivalry and opportunism during the 1920s - often wrapped in 'war on terror' rhetoric about the need to surveille bolsheviks, anarchists, freethinkers or other threats - saw calls by the Commonwealth Investigation Branch (a predecessor of the Australian Federal Police and Australian Security Intelligence Organisation) for detailed registration of and reporting by aliens.

The 1920 Act was hobbled by indifferent support from several state governments (whose police forces were much larger than the CIB and were busy with covert surveillance of citizens and aliens using non-public registers, most of which are no longer extant). In practice aliens were required to declare personal details using the 'A42' form on arrival in Australia but did not register their movement within the country or notify place of residence.

The Aliens Registration Act 1939 authorised creation of a register of aliens in each state/territory, with the person being required to carry a government identification document at all times for provision on request to a range of federal and state government officials. Associated 'war precautions' legislation imposed restrictions on travel and place of residence, accompanied by internment and deportation.

The regime was updated by the Aliens Act 1947, utilised by ASIO in building lists of those to intern in an emergency. The National Archives drily notes that the records about that activity

provide compelling reading and insight into the nature of citizenship and allegiance in Australia.

Official registration of eligible voters forms the basis of electoral rolls, maintained by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) and its federal predecessors, and by state agencies. Enrolment is compulsory for Commonwealth purposes for Australian citizens who are 18 years of age or over and who have lived at their current address for at least one month. The states and territories have joint roll agreements with the AEC: electors need complete only one form to enrol for federal, state/territory and local government elections. The electoral rolls provide a 'weak identifier' that features name, date of birth and address rather than a unique identification number.

Since 1925 federal electoral enrolment has been compulsory for all Australian citizens over the statutory voting age (lowered from 21 to 18 in 1974), with women being included on the federall rolls from 1902. All Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have been entitled to enrol since 1962, with a requirement to enrol since 1984. Between 1949 and 1962 they were eligible to enrol and vote only if they had served in the Defence Forces, or the electoral law in their State of residence qualified them to vote in State elections.
British subjects resident in Australia were eligible to enrol and vote until 1984.

Federal agencies with special access to the electoral roll under the Electoral & Referendum Regulations 1940 include the Defence Department, Department of Employment & Workplace Relations, Australia Post, Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, Australian Crime Commission, Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, Centrelink and Director of Public Prosecutions.

section marker icon     the 1939 National Register and identity card

The National Registration Act 1939, complementing the National Security Act 1939, established a National Register Board to develop a national labour register for economic planning purposes, identifying skilled workers and reserved occupations.

The register was compiled on a state by state and local basis, initially by Commonwealth Statistician and Commonwealth Electoral Office staff drawing on the federal electoral rolls. It was subsequently enhanced through a census covering all males of age 18 to 65, with information including indications of their property holdings. Registration did not involve people carrying a registration card or similar document. It was essentially a one-off exercise: the information was not systematically maintained and most registers were destroyed in 1944 on the grounds of privacy.

The register was replaced under the 1942 National Security (Man Power) Regulations with a scheme for registration of all persons over 16 years, with citizens receiving a basic identity card. That card was to to be carried at all times, displayed on request by officials and used in distribution of annual ration coupon books.

The identity card was abandoned soon after the cessation of hostilities in 1945 but there was a perceived need to maintain registration and thereby facilitate surveillance of aliens.

section marker icon     passports

The War Precautions Act 1914 required that all Australians over sixteen years of age possess a passport on leaving Australia and that all people entering the country have a passport (or surrogate) as a condition of entry.

Passport legislation and practice evolved with changes to the underlying nationality regime and new technology, with for example the words 'Australian Passport' replacing 'British Passport' on the cover of an Australian passport in 1949, a married woman's passport application no longer having to be authorised by her husband from 1983 onwards, and machine readable features being introduced in 1984.

The salient enactment is the Passports Act 1938 (PA), recurrently amended.

Early demand for passports was low, with only 30,000 Australian passports being issued in 1950. That rose to around 1.45 million in 2000. In the following year there were 586 identified cases of passport fraud and some 15,594 passports were lost/stolen.

Each passport features an eight-character alphanumeric registration number.

All Australian travel documents issued in Australia since 1984 are machine-readable, consistent with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) standards on Machine-Readable Travel Documents (MRTDs).

Australia is currently moving to incorporate biometric identifiers in its passports and is investigating use of RFID systems.

A more detailed discussion of passport systems, legislation and futures is provided in a separate note elsewhere on this site.

section marker icon     driver licensing

As official documents that incorporate a photograph (and are now held by around 50% of adult Australians) drivers licences have served as the de facto standard identity document in many private and public sector transactions.

Driver and vehicle registration is a state/territory rather than federal government responsibility, with state governments maintaining discrete driver license registers. There is thus no single integrated database or manual register covering all Australian drivers.

The scope for regulatory arbitrage led to implementation in 1999-2000 of a national driver licensing scheme under the auspices of the National Road Transport Commission, with uniform requirements for key licensing transactions such as licence issue, renewal, variation and suspension/cancellation. The scheme provides that people who reside continuously for over three months outside the state/territory in Australia in which the licence was issued should transfer the registration to the new jurisdiction. Individual states are exploring development of smartcard systems, some of which would move beyond authentication to provide electronic access to government services.

section marker icon     labour registers

Identification and regulation of labour by government has encompassed registration of males for military service, workers in particular occupations during periods of conflict and the unemployed (for income support) but has not directly involved
registration of doctors, lawyers and other specialists. All Australians thus have not had a national 'employment number' or similar identifier.

Compulsory military service regimes since Federation have involved registration of eligible males. Registration typically involved provision of information about name, address, date and place of birth, marital status, next of kin, employment and education history.

The Defence Acts of 1903 and 1904 authorised the federal Government to register and call-up 'unexempted' males (aged 18 to 60) in time of war, with compulsory military training and service within Australia and its territories in time of peace being established by the Defence Act 1909. Registration was abolished in 1929 but reintroduced in 1939 under the Defence Act of that year.

The National Service Act 1951, following the declaration of war in Korea, provided for registration and compulsory call-up for military service of males turning 18 after October 1950, with over 500,000 men registered between 1951 and 1959. Call-ups ceased in 1959. Five years later, with a warning from the Prime Minister about "aggressive Communism", the National Service Act 1964 introduced a compulsory selective national service scheme based on registration of 20-year-old males (with selection by ballot from names on that register). Peacetime conscription and registration formally ceased in 1973.

Official recognition through registration of doctors, lawyers and other members of the professions has reflected the division of responsibility between the federal government, the state/territory governments and professional organisations.

The registration of medical practitioners in Australia is thus a state/territory responsibility, with nongovernment bodies regulated by separate legislation in each jurisdiction. 'Mutual recognition' schemes provide reciprocal recognition of registration of the qualifications of a medical practitioner registered in another jurisdiction, with the Australian Medical Council administering the National Compendium of Medical Registers, a compendium of separate state registers to facilitate exchange of information between state Medical Registration Boards regarding the registration status of practitioners.

section marker icon     health services

Immediately prior to the Australia Card scheme the main national register involved administration of Medibank (Medicare from 1984), the national health insurance scheme.

Aspects of the scheme have varied bewilderingly since inception in 1975 but overall aims have been universal coverage, equity in distribution of costs and administrative simplicity. The scheme encompasses free hospital services for public patients in public hospitals through agreements with the states, subsidisation of payments by private patients for hospital services and benefits for out-of-hospital medical services such as consultations with general practitioners or specialists. It is complemented by the Pharmaecutical Benefits Scheme (PBS), subsidising access to prescription pharmaceuticals. Funding for the insurance scheme in its first year of operation was $1.6 billion; by 2002-3 that had grown to around $20 billion.

Administration of the scheme by the federal Health Insurance Commission (HIC), a statutory body established by the Health Insurance Act 1973 (here), involves registration of health service providers. It also involves identification of recipients with a number. That number features on a card supplied by the HIC to all adults (with children appearing on the card of a parent/guardian). The card does not include a photograph or biometric data; in essence its use by consumers is restricted to accessing health services. There is no requirement that people carry the card at all times or produce for purposes other than health services.

As of June 2002 some 20.4 million people were registered for Medicare benefits, a figure larger than the number of taxpayers. (Inclusion of some non-citizens results in a figure larger than the nation's population, which reached the 20 million mark in January 2004). Over 220 million services were processed in the year to June 2002. The PBS covered around 166 million prescriptions in the year to June 2004, at a cost of around $5.6 billion per year.

Administration of the scheme has featured data analysis to identify over-billing by health service providers or other abuses (with some matching of information held by the Australian Taxation Office or in other databases) and for epidemiological studies. It also involves a rich source of data about a very large population. As we have noted in discussing the Australian privacy regime and medical privacy special provision is made for the protection of identifiable personal information.

The Fraser Government's 1976 Medibank Review Committee (which restructured the Medibank financial arrangements and allowed the HIC to enter the private health insurance business with Medibank Private) reportedly considered but rejected introduction of an Australia Card style scheme.

The HIC also maintains the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register (ACIR) and Australian Organ Donor Register, discussed later in this profile.





icon for link to next page   next page (the Card ) 



any word
all words
 phrase

 

version of December 2004
© Caslon Analytics