Caslon Analytics elephant logo link to home page title for Australian Privacy Regimes profile

home | about | site use | services | guides | profiles | papers | timeline || Analysphere | Ketupa | Cinetext


overview

federal
agencies


other
aspects


private
sector


states

industry codes

money

media

health

adoption

crimes

workplace

cases 1

cases 2

landmarks






related pages icon
related
Guides:


Privacy

Secrecy



related pages icon
related
Profile:


Human
Rights

Australian
Constitution
& Cyberspace


Australia
Card


Passports

Official
Registers


100 Points
Scheme







section heading icon     adoption regimes


This page considers privacy aspects of adoption regimes of the Australian states, the Northern Territory and Australian Capital Territory.


It covers -

subsection heading icon     introduction

As we have noted in discussing questions about the body and privacy, attitudes towards adoption have undergone significant change in many countries, including Australia. That change has been reflected in amendment of legislation and codes of practice that restricted access to information about the biological parents of adopted children and the circumstances in which adoption took place.

Adoption is a state/territory responsibility, under the umbrella of the federal Family Law Act 1975. The federal Act is examined in Family Law in Australia (Sydney: Butterworths 1997) by H. Finlay, Rebecca Bailey-Harris & Margaret Otlowski, complemented by To Search for Self: The experience of access to adoption information (Leichhardt: Federation Press 1997) edited by Phillip & Shurlee Swain. Historical context is provided by The Many-Sided Triangle: Adoption in Australia (Carlton South: Melbourne Uni Press 2001) by Audrey Marshall & Margaret McDonald.

All states/territories have legislation that grants certain information rights to adopted people over the age of 17 and to their adoptive and birth families.

subsection heading icon     access to adoption information

The extent of those rights and privacy protection varies from one jurisdiction to another, as does information services (including contact registers and differing arrangements for mandatory or non-mandatory counselling before information is provided).

In several states it is possible for a party to an adoption to gain a one-time or recurrent veto on release of information or on contact (eg in Victoria it is an offence for the information recipient to try to make contact with the person who imposed the contact veto).

The Adoptions Australia 2002-03 report (PDF) notes that there were 472 adoptions of children in Australia during 2002-03. Around 3,740 requests for information were made, of which 73% were by adopted children, 17% by birth parents and 2% by a child of an adopted person.

Some 137 contact and identifying information vetoes were lodged during the year, with 9,930 vetoes in place (of which 53% were by an adopted person and 38% by the birth mother).

subsection heading icon     registers

State/territory registers are highlighted here.


icon for link to next page   next page (spent convictions)



this site
the web

Google

version of November 2005
© Caslon Analytics